Insights straight to your inbox
Join 10,000+ subscribers getting the latest insights on AI monetization.
One marketing decision turns into 6 billboards, 4 creative directions, and a Figma with 50 different options - that’s what we wrestled with for our recent campaign.
I wanted maximum bang for our buck, not the "spray and pray" approach other people seem to love. We didn't know what works yet, so going all-in felt reckless.
Plus, I wasn't interested in the "make people angry for attention" playbook that seems popular these days. That's not us - at least not right now.
I contacted a couple of agencies, and most came back with what I'd call "the usual suspects" - every outdoor concept fell into predictable buckets:
As I looked through our customer conversations (around 250 of them!), I found a few patterns that seemed to do the trick.
I don’t think developers wake up excited about "cost management". It’s often an afterthought. However, management seems to worry about margins.
During our first round, we did too much explanation.
During the second round, it was too pithy and clever.
"Building a billing UI is like watching paint dry. But less fun" - Better, but requires too much processing time at 65mph.
Third round: What we actually went with
Smart budgeting means testing first, scaling second.
We're not trying to piss people off for viral moments. We're trying to solve real problems for real developers.
The billboards are live across SF now - try and find them!
We are, of course, tracking which messages drive the most event signups for our upcoming event, as well as overall site visits. Then double down on what actually converts.
Anyone else taken the "measure twice, cut once" approach to out of home advertising?
Let's see if being strategic beats being loud.
p.s. these aren't as expensive as you think they'd be.
Join 10,000+ subscribers getting the latest insights on AI monetization.
Price smarter. Protect margins. Grow revenue.